deirdre: (Default)

November 5 (as in Guy Fawkes Day) is Bank Transfer Day, a movement to take funds out of banks that received bailouts and move it to either independent local banks or credit unions (I favor the latter as credit unions are non-profit organizations).

Sadly, though I’ve known about it for a week or two, I haven’t yet gotten my act together on this, so I’ll be taking care of the move over a couple of weeks.

Many credit unions now have big-bank features like online bill pay, etc.

This site will help you find a credit union.

One of the coolest features of credit unions? You can deposit and withdraw from CUs that aren’t yours if you get one that’s an affiliate with the CU Service Center Network. Many 7-Eleven stores and all Co-op network locations have free ATMs.

Many have one “loophole” way to join if you’re not otherwise eligible. For example, Stanford Federal Credit Union lets you join if you’re a member of Friends of the Palo Alto Library (membership costs $15), and (last I checked), they would open your account and add the membership at the same time. While I’ve kept up my membership in FPAL (it’s the next town over for me, after all), it’s not necessary to do so.

Hope this helps!

Originally published at deirdre.net. You can comment here or there.

deirdre: (Default)
Well, that was fast. Story here. Jury deliberated two hours.

"We're not trying to justify it. (Ciancio's) death is a tragedy but it is not first-degree murder," said Sarah Quinn, one of Fowler's two defense attorneys. "(Fowler's) only plan was to take his own life. No intent. No deliberation. It was just a tragic reaction by Mr. Fowler."

If you're going to commit suicide and not pay severance to a former employee, you can go to your favorite place (like maybe the Rockies so you don't endanger a whole bunch of other people) and just off yourself rather than take a gun to the office when you've got an appointment with the person asking for a check and killing them instead.

Not that any of this makes any rational sense anyway but I had to vent.
deirdre: (Default)
Executive summary: William Rex Fowler, a prominent Scientologist, shot and killed a former employee coming in for a severance check of < $10k. Fowler's business was desperate for cash after Fowler gave ~$175k to Scientology. After shooting Ciancio, Fowler then attempted suicide, but lived.

It's clear that Fowler was intending to attempt suicide given his preparations, but less clear to me that he intended to kill Ciancio from the outset. Ciancio was a father of four who had been married to his high school sweetheart for nearly half his life.

Story here. Short version: two days of hearings, on the third morning, defense rested without calling a single defense witness.

I already linked to day 1 of the trial previously, here's the link to day two.

Most interesting bit: they had Fowler's son testify about giving the gun to his father as a Christmas present. Fowler's son was a member of Scientology's religious order, the Sea Org at the time. It's not clear if he still is; his claimed address is in Santa Fe, New Mexico, which is near Scientology's Trementina Base. (Even if you don't care about the trial, that link is interesting; you can see it from the air.)

ETA: Here's a short guide to a criminal case that'll say where the case is in progress. Because defense comes after prosecution for witnesses and evidence, that also means prosecution has rested. Since there were no witnesses, there was no defense evidence (because evidence is hearsay without witnesses), so there's no rebuttal, so I think we're up to jury instructions.
deirdre: (Default)
You may remember my post about Rex Fowler, who apparently shot and killed resigning employee Thomas Ciancio in December 2009 (just before Thomas was off to his kid's birthday party).

Here's the details on the first day of the trial.
deirdre: (Default)
This is a sad tale about money, Scientology, and murder.

Scientology's quite expensive to get to the upper levels. On the "auditing" side of the bridge, some people report figures as low as $300,000 and others over $1,000,000 to get from the beginning through OT VII.

Of late, there's been even more money pressure to contribute to schemes L. Ron Hubbard (LRH) wouldn't have approved of, including building funds for "Ideal Orgs" (this kind of fundraising was expressly forbidden before LRH died by LRH's own policy) and the International Association of Scientologists (IAS), which seems to be a black hole into which Scn's contributions get sucked into. Kirstie Alley, for example, has donated at least 2.5 mil to IAS.

In the 1970s, Rex Fowler was a minister performing weddings within Scientology.

In 1989, Rex completed OT VII, which is the penultimate level available at the time; OT VIII was released in the late 80s, but requires going to the Freewinds, and it's expensive.

At some point, Rex started Fowler Software Design (FSD), which, at least in its later years, incorporated LRH's management technology, requiring him to be a WISE (Worldwide Institute of Scientology Enterprises) member. In general, this is a bad deal for such businesses, but that's a side issue.

Now, as you and I know, not all computer people are Scientologists, and so Fowler hired Tom Ciancio as COO. Some reports say he did a lot of the technical work. What is clear is that Ciancio was a part-owner of the company. Per a report (source):
The news reports say that Tom was a "partner". Everyone was a "partner" because their was a mandatory contribution to the company with each payday. When you left FSD, you were supposed to be "bought out"; however myself and each person I know that left FSD during my x years there never got a penny.
So, at the end of 2008, Fowler was encouraged to get back on OT VII.

Wait, you say, he completed it in 1989, he has to do it again?

Why yes, he does. One person I know of, Claire Woodruff, completed (new) OT VII twice and OT VIII three times. Normally, actions are completed once, but they were forced to re-do upper levels for specious reasons, largely because OT VII is such a great cash cow.

OT VII is a solo auditing action. Back when it first started, you paid for hours of case supervision in advance, and that was it. Then one had to go to Flag every six months, and that involved time and money away from home at hellacious hourly rates. More things kept being added to the point where, about ten years ago, a six-month check involved about 6 weeks. So, for a full quarter each year, you'd be gone from home, not making money, and spending about $20-50,000 per year.

It's gotten worse since then.

So when Rex's org's OT committee reported that he was "back on the level" in December, 2008, that meant a whole lotta money was going to go to Scientology for years to come. In fact, one report says between $150k and $250k and another says up to $200k "since 2008." (links later) The great suck of resources had begun.

Now, most Scientologist staff at FSD would not have said a peep about this, because if they did, they'd have to get an "ethics handling" about being "counter-intentioned" (I had a few of those myself, so I know whereof I speak, and things are worse now) and may actually be denied their own OT levels later on.

And then there was Ciancio, who wanted out, and probably wanted his share of the $ that had been sent to various Scn organizations.

So Ciancio agreed with Fowler over the amount of settlement, purportedly $9,900. Ciancio goes to FSD to pick up his check, and winds up dead with three shots to the head. This left Ciancio's wife a widow, and their four kids without a father.

Fowler then apparently attempted suicide, and failed in a particularly horrific way (source):
He has an entry wound (bullet hole) under the chin. The bullet travelled through his tongue, through the roof of his mouth, through the sinuses, through the frontal lobe and exited out the top of his head. His mouth is wired shut and he is heavily sedated.
This all happened at the end of last year. Today, more than three weeks later, Fowler was charged with murder one, which is covered in this article and this article.

Over $9,900? Wrong target much?

In a particularly interesting wrinkle to the case, OT VII materials are generally kept in a locked briefcase in a locked closet because OT VII people need to have several sessions a day. So the police find a note instructing them to give the briefcase to his wife, and the police still have it. Most everyone who's done OT VII believes it is his parishioner files -- which brings up an interesting question about solo auditing sessions: In regular auditing sessions, you're giving a confession to a minister, so they're generally not admissible, but in a solo session, you're telling yourself. Admissible? No? Could make for some interesting case law. My guess is that it'll be about as admissible as a journal and for largely the same reasons.
When Janet Fowler was interviewed by detectives, she told them she wanted the briefcase returned immediately.

"It is important to me and my church. It is religious material and I want it now," she said to investigators. "Even if you looked at it, and read it, you would not understand anything in it. Because it is way above a normal person and you would not know what it meant. I want it back right now."
You stay classy, Janet.

Edited to add: third story link, including more briefcase weirdness. Further interesting quote:
Employee Robert Read told police "Thomas Ciancio started to become very frustrated with Fowler, saying he was embezzling money and a crook."

A former employee Stephan Samuel said, "he and Ciancio were able to see several large withdraws (sp) by Fowler totaling in the area of 200,000.00 to 250,000.00 dollars."

Samuel says "Thomas Ciancio did not like William Fowler taking the company's money and causing a financial hardship on the company."

Employees say that money went to a church. read said he knew this information "because William Fowler had to apologize to everyone in writing for what he did."


Update: it seems most likely that Rex had decided to commit suicide and have Janet handle the briefcase (though I doubt he told her that), and Ciancio's agreed-upon payout may just have been wrapping things up beforehand. It does seem more likely that the whole note and briefcase thing was more likely about suicide than premeditated murder. It'll be interesting to follow the case and see what comes out.
deirdre: (Default)
A friend of mine committed suicide recently, and I happened to be in the social group where we hung out a lot tonight. Someone hadn't heard, and then asked what had happened.

Another person then asked me, "Do you want to tell him?"

Publicly, no one's said anything about suicide, and I'm a bit surprised. My friend had a support group that he didn't know existed, and he kept things bottled up. He was giving a pep talk to someone about job hunting less than a week before he killed himself -- ironically enough, he was obviously the one who needed the pep talk.

He'd filed bankruptcy just before the laws changed, but because of arcane rules about what can be discharged in a chapter 7 vs. what can be discharged in a chapter 13, it had to be a 13 in order to take care of the debt that was hurting the most. Of course, that requires continued payments for several years.

Then he lost his job. In August, he told me privately that he had until October 20 to save his house. At that time, he didn't tell me that his bankruptcy had been dismissed because he couldn't make the payments. He'd never mentioned that. You might think it odd that he would mention it, but our social circle is about finance, and we don't judge each other. We try to help each other out.

He didn't ask for help -- not from anyone -- and he could have. There are so many other places he could have gotten help, many for free. Like many people in a crisis, he couldn't see past his nose.

And so, not long after that day came and went, I get a call from the family. My friend is dead. Separately, I hear that he'd killed himself, which I then confirmed.

Intellectually, I can almost understand how he got into the state where he felt that killing himself would be solving a problem for the family, and how it would be easier for them with him gone. What I can't understand is why he didn't tell anyone how much trouble he was in, especially those of us who might have been able to relieve a bit of the pressure.

So, please -- if you're in trouble -- please reach out to someone. If they fail you, please reach out to someone else. Spread the misery around a bit to your friends and don't keep it bottled up. It's true we can't solve your problems for you, but maybe what we can offer will be enough.

Also, if you need just that little bit of extra help in a crisis but are otherwise eking by, I'd like to point out Modest Needs.

Profile

deirdre: (Default)
deirdre

February 2017

S M T W T F S
   1234
56789 1011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 19th, 2026 06:37 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios